Controversy in the Classroom: Strategies for managing climate change discourse
View related webinar:
Teaching climate change in a community that does not want to hear it »
View resources for addressing mental health aspects of climate change:
Teaching Climate Towards Empowerment »
Understanding the controversy | Diffuse conflict and foster agreement | Responding to tough questions | Should we teach "both sides"? | Building media literacy
This page aims to help teachers navigate the controversial aspects of climate change, and offers concrete suggestions for how to foster an open dialog with students, parents, or co-workers. This page is not about rebutting myths about climate change, but some common themes are addressed in CLEAN's teacher guidance section, such as the Sun is not causing recent warming, humans are impacting the climate system, and humans can take actions to reduce climate change and its impacts.
Controversy is not a bad thing
It's understandable to have reservations when diving into a controversial subject, but there are some upsides. If no one cared about climate change, there would be no controversy. But Earth's climate is relevant to almost everyone, and students are likely to have personal experiences and opinions about the topic. Since so much misinformation about climate change circulates through the media, you can offer a much-needed opportunity for students to learn about the subject in an organized, formalized way that will help them build scientific mastery amid a sea of opinions, misinformation, and hearsay.
Why is climate change controversial?
In most cases, the root of the pushback on climate change is because the potential solutions are seen as objectionable by some. That's understandable, because climate change is a planetary problem, and calls for sweeping policy action. But certain corporations and political groups have worked to undermine public trust in climate science. (Example work on this topic: Supran and Oreskes paper and op-ed; InsideClimate News Exxon investigations; NESTA's response to Heartland Institute mailings)
While we can wish that these groups would have taken up the controversy in the policy arena, they instead chose to sow doubt in the science. It's important to understand that in most cases people that dismiss climate change are more concerned with policy and values, not science. They may express their doubts in a scientific-sounding way, but the basis for their unease usually runs deeper than that.
Because misconceptions about climate change are widely circulated, it's quite likely that your students may have latched on to incorrect information about climate or energy. Furthermore, the origins of this misinformation may be from family members or friends. It's important to not disparage the sources of misinformation, so as not to unintentionally criticize students or their friends and families.
- If I just explain the facts, they'll get it, right?, a short video by Katharine Hayhoe.
- What's Really Warming the World? (more info) A quick and easy visual that offers a compelling way to understand the human influence on climate, compared to natural factors.
Should you strive to avoid controversy?
The goal of teaching climate change need not be to steer clear of anything controversial. Ideally, your classroom offers a safe, trusting environment in which to explore the topic. If students have concerns, they should be encouraged to raise them so that you can understand their perspective and help alleviate whatever conflict the subject may be causing.
Set the stage to minimize conflict
Potentially disruptive conflict can often be avoided by establishing a classroom atmosphere that welcomes debate and dialog. In many cases, friction arises when people do not feel respected or listened to.
- Foster an open dialog in class. That is not the same thing as accepting there are two sides to everything (more about 'both sides' below). Not every fact is correct; but every perspective does have value.
- A few easy strategies to stave off unnecessary friction: Humility, curiosity, openness to questions, willingness to explore more deeply.
- Attributes that may cause controversy to flare up: Dismissive to questions, reliance on scientific authority, attempts to shut down dialog, judgmental attitude toward 'deniers,' value-laden judgments on polluters or people with high carbon footprints.
- It's good practice to avoid advocating for particular political candidates or parties. But general policy guidelines -- i.e., we need to use fewer fossil fuels -- are in accordance with scientists' recommendations and are a fundamental part of climate literacy.
Concrete ways to diffuse conflict:
- Listen fully to the person's concern or question.
- Ask clarifying questions to understand their perspective. Strive to make the questions open ended and inquisitive, rather than 'gotcha'-style questions.
- Reflect what you're hearing back to them.
- Acknowledge the value of that person's point of view. (Create a Validating Classroom Environment from the SAGE 2YC project)
- Repeat these steps until the person feels heard and you feel you understand where they are coming from.
- Share your knowledge or perspective in ways that are directly relevant to their concerns.
The more time you spend asking questions, listening carefully, and reflecting on the person's concerns, the better you will both feel.
If a conflict arises in front of students (or co-workers) you will understandably feel put on the spot, but as long as you keep the classroom open to all perspectives, it can be a useful learning experience. The more you can ask questions and keep the dialog open, the easier it will be.
- Reference: "The Radical Conversation Cycle": joinsmart.org/the-rcc.html.
- CLEAN resource: Have the Talk: Climate Conversations (more info) The video component to this lesson unveils the 'secret' to talking about climate change. (Spoiler: The secret is to listen.)
Conversation strategies that can foster agreement
- Appreciate where your audience is coming from.
- Respect their intelligence and their values.
- Frame your argument to match the values of your audience.
- Be factual. Use facts that are relevant to your audience.
- Use stories. A personal angle can be more convincing than data.
- Make sure everyone in the conversation can 'save face' while also, maybe changing their mind.
- Offer a path forward. Motivate, inspire, lead by example, make it easy for others to follow your lead.
- Leverage areas of easy agreement
What if I don't know the scientific answer to someone's question?
There is no person on Earth that knows the answer to every question about climate and energy. Understandably, we all want to feel informed on the topics we teach. Nobody likes the idea of being called out on a question that we're unable to answer.
The good news is that you don't have to rebut every possible angle. Most of the time, pushback on climate change is not really about science. If you ask some probing questions and gently dig deeper, you will likely arrive at a place that has nothing to do with science. People are not upset about carbon isotopes; they are worried about taxes or high energy prices, or excessive government regulation. If you can guide the conversation toward the root of someone's concerns, then it will be much easier to respond to them.
This article from Yale Climate Connections profiles several teachers, including high school teacher Kelli Grabowski, who shares her story of being challenged by her students. She describes how she accepted the challenge to learn more, and it ended up having a positive impact on the class.
Ah ha! But what if I DO know the scientific answer to someone's question?
Undoubtedly, it's a satisfying feeling to be able to pinpoint precisely why a given piece of misinformation is flawed. But, knowing the 'answer' can sometimes just lead to more friction. One aspect of what makes people bristle about climate science is being 'told what to do.' Resist the temptation to use science to squelch people's doubts. Instead, try to unearth their concerns and hear them out. Strive for dialog, rather than relying on a position of authority.
Should we teach 'both sides'?
Occasionally we hear that we should teach a 'balanced view' of climate science. (Examples: Should Global Warming Be Taught in Public Schools? and School Science Lessons Targeted by Climate Change Doubters.
But some things do not have two sides. CO2 is a greenhouse gas that blocks outgoing heat and warms the atmosphere. This was established in the 1800s and is no longer an area of scientific debate. Greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere are rising sharply due to the burning of fossil fuels; the Earth is warming. None of these points is contested in any scientific circle. When it comes to teaching science, it's essential to stick to credible science from the scientific community. To do any less would be a disservice to our students.
That said, the wider topic of climate change and climate policy is absolutely a multifaceted issue. Discussions about policy, energy, economics, social science, or personal actions will have many perspectives. The need for 'two sides' on the science can be sidestepped by offering two (or more) sides in other realms. Assure parents and students that there is plenty of room for dialog and debate about how we should respond to climate change.
Examples of role-playing activities that tackle responses to climate change:
- Greenhouse Emissions Reduction Role-Play Exercise (more info)
- Who Will Take the Heat? (more info)
- What are the causes and effects of ENSO? (more info)
- Simulation of international negotiations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (more info)
- World Climate: Climate Change Negotiations Game (more info)
Building media literacy
In today's polarized discourse, many topics devolve into a 'battle of the sources,' with each side claiming the other's sources are rife with ideological slant. In the sciences, it's a little different, though, because we have the neutral arbiter of the peer-reviewed scientific literature. Nonetheless, some people conclude that scientists are biased and unethical. Ironically, these claims emanate from highly partisan, often inflammatory outlets.
So, how does one break the stalemate of the sources? It depends.
In a dialog, undermining someone else's sources is likely to make them dig into their argument even more fervently. Instead, use the conversational techniques described above to try to learn more about why a person feels as they do, make them feel heard, and explore for areas of agreement.
In class, teach media literacy skills to build a solid foundation for how students can evaluate the credibility of materials for themselves.
- The Stink Test: Validating Resources (more info)
- Is that true? (more info)
- Teaching Climate Science by Studying Misinformation (more info)
Additional CLEAN resources
- Have the Talk: Climate Conversations (more info)
- Yale Climate Opinion Maps - U.S. (more info) - Note how there is agreement in some areas (like renewable energy research, and imposing limits to CO2 pollution) but disagreement in others (like whether scientists agree that humans are changing the climate). Exploring regional/geographical differences in public attitudes is also insightful.
- Texans don't care about climate change, right? (more info)
- Watch the recorded webinar, It's Us: Humans as agents of change within Earth's climate system for ideas to teach the most controversial aspect of climate change.
- Most common climate myths and scientific responses, from Skeptical Science. Note that a rebuttal alone is not likely to resolve controversy. Refer to dialog strategies described above.
- Even a quick glance at the history of climate research helps readers appreciate how the fundamentals of climate science have stood the test of time. People who are new to the issue may inadvertently believe that the issue itself is new, while in reality we have understood the basis for human-caused warming for over 120 years.
- Common Ground on Climate Change - A series of conversations between people on opposite sides of the issue. In every case, they were able to find major areas of agreement.
- Inoculation theory: Using misinformation to fight misinformation - by John Cook, Center for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University
- The Debunking Handbook, by John Cook and Stephan Lewandowsky. Available as a free pdf in 13 languages.