Initial Publication Date: March 30, 2022

CLEAN Teleconference Call February 10, 2015

1.png
[reuse info]
Provenance: Noun Project
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
2.png
[reuse info]
Provenance: Daniela Pennycook, University of Colorado at Boulder
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.

Hydrofracking, Climate Change, and Evolution Outreach Yields Rules of Thumb for Teaching about Controversial Issues

Abstract:
The Paleontological Research Institution has a long history of nurturing public understanding of controversial issues. PRI's 11-year-old Museum of the Earth is built around the idea of evolution, and evolution education stretches back long before that. For more than a decade, PRI has engaged in climate change education, and, for the last several years, we have been engaged in energy education rooted in the science related to slickwater high-volume hydraulic fracturing (HVHF). These issues share common characteristics, and common rules of thumb are derived from our extensive work on teaching controversial issues. There are, however, differences amongst these issues and amongst the approaches that should be used in building understandings that can yield informed decisions.

Controversial issues tend to be interdisciplinary in nature; complex; play out across multiple scales of time and/or space; and are made difficult to understand by cognitive biases. Climate change and evolution share the characteristic of grounding in areas of consensus science. While there is consensus that HVHF causes environmental harm there is no consensus as to whether the environmental costs associated with HVHF are lesser or greater than those associated with other ways of generating energy on the scale currently required by modern society.

Rules of thumb for teaching about controversial issues include recognizing that: while grounding in evidence is essential, a focus simply upon the related science is insufficient to build understanding; effective approaches for certain audiences may backfire to the point of deepening misconceptions and related convictions if used with other audiences; reframing questions away from the most obvious and most polarizing questions is often helpful; argument in the traditional sense (and potentially advocacy in the traditional sense) may deepen convictions more than understandings; and; attending to issues of scale with familiar examples and user-friendly analogies can deepen understanding.

Bio:
Don Duggan-Haas is the Director of Teacher Programs at The Paleontological Research Institution and its Museum of the Earth in Ithaca, NY. Don has taught at Colgate, Cornell, and Michigan State Universities, Kalamazoo College, and Tapestry and Norwich (New York) High Schools. His current work focuses on teacher professional development and curriculum materials development that fosters understanding of the central ideas of Earth systems science by engaging students and teachers in the close study of their local environments, and using those local understandings to grok larger natural systems and human roles within those systems. Or, that's the aspiration at least.

Email list archive Join the CLEAN Network

Recent and upcoming CLEAN Network telecon topics and speakers »

Return to the CLEAN Network home page »

CLEAN CollectionTeaching about Climate and Energy