Mann and Ramsdorf on IPCC 2013
https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2013/11/new-ipcc-report-featured-in-this-months-this-is-not-cool-video/
https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2013/11/new-ipcc-report-featured-in-this-months-this-is-not-cool-video/
Yale Climate Forum
In this video, Michael Mann and Stefan Rahmstorf explore some of the information from the 2013 IPCC 5th report in light of public perceptions of climate science.
Video length is about 7:56 min.
Learn more about Teaching Climate Literacy and Energy Awareness»Grade Level
Topics
Climate Literacy
This Video builds on the following concepts of Climate Literacy.
Click a topic below for supporting information, teaching ideas, and sample activities.
Notes From Our Reviewers
The CLEAN collection is hand-picked and rigorously reviewed for scientific accuracy and classroom effectiveness.
Read what our review team had to say about this resource below or learn more about
how CLEAN reviews teaching materials
Teaching Tips | Science | Pedagogy |
Technical Details
Teaching Tips
- This video would be more suited to environmental studies, political science, media studies or the like.
- Video could be used as a wrap-up, after students have a handle on the science, in order to jump to questions about how confusion on the science has moved into mainstream culture.
- A good video to introduce the effects of increasing global temperatures as well as demonstrating the way science is done - scientists using data, making predictions, and then testing the predictions over time.
About the Content
- The key content of this video is the evolution of the acceptance of climate science.
- Interviews and other clips consider the conservative predictions of the IPCC 5th report, as in a previous report underestimating Arctic sea ice melt; the long-standing views of scientists with predictions as far back as the 1960s, which have come to actuality; and the importance of the science in the report.
- Video content is interdisciplinary and covers science and the history of climate science.
- Points out how older models have been proven to be correct 25 years later.
- Passed initial science review - expert science review pending.