National Institute of Health
Discuss this Resource»
Learn more about Teaching Climate Literacy and Energy Awareness»
About Teaching Climate Literacy
Other materials addressing 7e
Other materials addressing Cli
Benchmarks for Science Literacy
Learn more about the Benchmarks
Notes From Our Reviewers
The CLEAN collection is hand-picked and rigorously reviewed for scientific accuracy and classroom effectiveness.
Read what our review team had to say about this resource below or learn more about
how CLEAN reviews teaching materials
Teaching Tips | Science | Pedagogy |
- The article at http://www.climatenetwork.org/sites/default/files/PNAS_IPCC_Reassessing_DANGEROUS_CC.full_.pdf provides ample background for teaching about this figure and the 5 reasons for concern.
About the Science
- This figure is taken from this 2009 article -- http://www.climatenetwork.org/sites/default/files/PNAS_IPCC_Reassessing_DANGEROUS_CC.full_.pdf. It updates Figure SPM2 first presented in IPCC TAR SPM of WG II- see http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc5Ftar/src/climate/ipcc_tar/wg2/figspm-2.htm.
- The figure describe revisions of the sensitivities of the 5 reasons for concern (RFCs) to increases in global mean temperature and a more thorough understanding of the concept of vulnerability that has evolved since 2001.
- This is based on expert judgment about new findings in the growing literature since the publication of the TAR in 2001 including literature that was assessed in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report AR4 as well as additional research published since AR4.
- The 5 reasons for concern are Risk to Unique and Threatened Systems, Risk of Extreme Weather Events, Distribution of Impacts, Aggregate Damages, and Risks of Large-Scale Discontinuities.
- Passed initial science review - expert science review pending.
About the Pedagogy
- The original figure was designed primarily to communicate the associations of impacts with increases in global mean temperature and facilitate examination of the underlying evidence for use by decision-makers contemplating responses to these concerns.
- This figure is a revision of that original figure. The differences provide an opportunity to discuss how recent research as changed some of the original assessments.
- May be a little complex; high school (9-12) and college (13-16)
- Full PNAS article at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2648893/
Have you used these materials with your students? Do you have insights to share with other educators about their use? Please share with the community by adding a comment below.
Please use this space only for discussion about teaching with these particular materials.
For more general discussion about teaching climate literacy please use our general discussion boards.
To report a problem or direct a comment to the CLEAN project team please use our feedback form (or the feedback link at the bottom of every page).
Off-topic posts will be deleted.